Types of Escharotics
Escharotic:
A caustic substance that causes a chemical
reaction with tissue, usually attended by heat, itching, and
burning that results in the destruction of the reactive tissue.

Allopathic and natural medicine represent two distinct medical
traditions, each with a long history. Both schools of medicine
agree that it is necessary to destroy or remove malignancies.
So, allopathic medicine has relied on surgery and/or toxic
minerals such as arsenic and antimony or caustic chemicals
such as zinc chloride or nitric acid, this for at least the
last 2500 years. Running parallel to the allopathic school,
there has always been a tradition of natural medicine, one
that relied less on surgery and chemicals and more on plants.
Even Hippocrates suggested to his students that if they were
more interested in surgery than diet and herbs that they
should follow the army because that is where they could practice
surgery.
During much of history, the schism between
the two schools of medicine was deep and acrimonious, not really
much different than what we see today since proponents of each
modality exhibit the kind of ignorance that fuels efforts to
discredit whatever is not understood. The difference is that
allopathy currently holds more power and so has the ability
to persecute the proponents of natural healing, though even
this is not new. In France, 700 years ago, curing using natural
methods, even prayer, was deemed criminal unless one possessed
the proper credentials and followed the rules of the profession,
this in Christian countries that should have celebrated all
such wondrous healing.
Merging of Traditions
Ironically, where escharotics
are concerned, the two systems of medicine joined forces about
150 years ago when Eclectic physicians began combining zinc
chloride, first with bloodroot and later with goldenseal. Even
stranger to the history of medicine, this merger occurred both
within the ranks of professional physicians as well as lay
practitioners. This fact is made no more clear than with the
two main twentieth century exponents of escharotic use.
The highly controversial Harry Hoxsey and
entirely respectable Frederic Mohs, M.D., seem to have had
nearly identical formulae. Hoxsey was wholly lacking in proper
credentials, but he inherited a "deathbed" formula
and eventually came to operate the largest chain of cancer
hospitals of his time. He was possessed of an intimidating
tenacity that alienated him from virtually the entire officialdom
of his time, but he was praised by patients who claimed to
owe their cures to him.
While doing research with the University of
Wisconsin, Dr. Mohs developed what he called a fixative paste
that, like many physicians of the 19th century, he used in
conjunction with a minor amount of surgery. The Mohs method
is now standard for basal cell carcinomas where it enjoys a
99% success rate. Hoxsey's
work was moved across the border where it is still widely
regarded as the most successful cancer treatment available.
Salves and Pastes
Whether we are looking at lay
persons who provide salves to customers as a matter of cultural
or religious tradition or at the Mohs fixative paste, most
of the preparations that are today available are a mixture
of herbs and zinc chloride. Very few are purely botanical;
and those that are tend to be salves rather than pastes. Pastes
are water-based products that are quite thick and usually also
a bit sticky. They tend to dry out and cake up when in contact
with body heat.
Salves have some sort of oil
to aid penetration. Though it is not necessarily a matter of
water versus oil, the salves that are to be found "on
the street" are usually less aggressive and slower acting
than the pastes.