Treatment Using the Escharotic
Approach
As those who read my book know, I favor
the methods used by Dr. John Pattison because they are
gentler and more appealing to me; but I have no evidence that
his success was any higher than that of those who used more
aggressive escharotics and more decisive strategies. Pattison
used goldenseal rather
than bloodroot.
I love bloodroot and have a little growing in my garden, but
I have heard too many bloodroot stories to recommend bloodroot
to the uninitiated. It is a highly unpredictable herb, very
potent, interesting, dramatic, and precious, but not controllable.

Bloodroot escharotics are
aggressive; they destroy cancer and probably some other conditions
as well. Goldenseal salves are different. They seem to permit
some cells to return to normal. They promote a separation
of the tumor from the supporting tissue, i.e., they are "enucleating" rather
than escharotic. They also work more slowly and are therefore
not appropriate when time is an important factor.
There are many salve products
and they are not all equal. I have deliberately not included
instructions for salve use on this site because people really
do need to read the book before
commencing use of such products. This treatment is far too
complex to be undertaken lightly, and cancer is too serious
for errors.
If after reading my book,
someone wants to use one of the methods described in the
book, he or she can make the product needed (using one of
the formulas in the book) or buy a
ready-made product and proceed, but the book should be carefully
understood before commencing.
Boluses
I do not feel this way
at all about the boluses.
They do not contain aggressive ingredients, and they pose
no real risks beyond false complacency. No matter what treatment
is selected, assessments of the effectiveness and thoroughness
of the treatment have to be made at critical intervals so
as not to waste time that might be used to overcome the disease.
Like many before me,
I believe the herbal adjunctive treatments
to be more important than the salves because they address
constitutional imbalances and
weaknesses that are vital to health. However, they cannot
be expected to work if patients persist in unhealthy eating
habits or dysfunctional emotional patterns. Therefore, I
have come to see diet as more important than herbs and inner
poise and balance as more important that the physical protocols.
Why? We eat three times
a day; and what we eat is needed by the body to repair worn
out tissues. If we lack the nutrients needed to build healthy
new cells, it does not matter what else we do, the foundation
of true health will be lacking.
There are many cancer dietsand
it is inconceivable that they are all sound or that any of
them work for everyone. I believe diets need to be tailored
to the constitutional type and unique imbalances of the patient.
In other words, though macrobiotic or Gerson diets may be
improvements over many standard diets, they may not be specific
enough for a given individual. With the new diets based on
blood types, there will continue to be foment on this subject.
My own dietary concepts are based heavily on Ayurvedic medicine
and the strength or weakness of each system of the body. I
believe that the body breaks down where it is weak and that
we must determine what the weaknesses are. In other words,
there are few standard prescriptions but rather a need for
careful evaluation for each person.